Jan 2011 to 2000 Sales ConsultantPrime Foreclosures Chandler, AZ Jun 2011 to Jun 2013 Product Sales & DemonstratorPath-to-Health Clinic Idaho Falls, ID Nov 2007 to Aug 2009 Water System SalesThe Times-News Twin Falls, ID May 1996 to Jun 1998 Advertising Sales Representative
Education:
Chandler-Gilbert Community College Jan 2012 to Dec 2012 BioChemistry, MicrobiologySnow College Aug 2009 to Dec 2010 ChemistryBrigham Young University Jun 1990 to Aug 1994 Bachelor of Arts in Public Relations
Mar 2011 to 2000 Merchant Solutions Frontlines Team Lead - SupervisorFOX Eau Claire, WI Mar 2010 to Jun 2010 Account Executive, SalesNationwide Telecom Brokers, Inc Edina, MN Jul 2004 to Oct 2009 Agent Program Master - National Independent Telecom BrokerIntegra Telecom Bloomington, MN Sep 2003 to Jul 2004 Account Executive, SalesPopp Telecom Golden Valley, MN Nov 2000 to Aug 2003 Account Executive, SalesFinancial Net Services Bloomington, MN Nov 1999 to Oct 2000 Customer Accounts Manager/ Office Manager
Oct 2011 to 2000 Family Nurse PractitionerBlue Springs Family Care
May 2011 to 2000 Family Nurse PractitionerChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Kansas City, MO Apr 2005 to Jun 2011 Critical Care RNAll About Staffing Kansas City, KS Apr 2005 to Dec 2008 Critical Care RNResearch Medical Kansas City, MO Feb 2003 to Apr 2005 Critical Care RN
Education:
University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, MO 2010 Masters of Science in NursingGraceland University 2003 Bachelors of Science in NursingBlue River Community College 2001 Associates in ArtsFort Osage High School 1996
Mar 2014 to 2000 Regional Sales ManagerAmerican Hotel Register Vernon Hills, IL Apr 2012 to Mar 2014 Contract Pricing ManagerKenall Manufacturing Gurnee, IL Jun 2009 to Apr 2012 Regional Sales ManagerKenall Manufacturing Gurnee, IL Mar 2006 to Jan 2008 Quotation SpecialistUnified Solutions- Packaging Company Pleasant Prairie, WI Apr 2004 to Mar 2006 Account Specialist-SC Johnson AccountAlfa Laval Flow Pleasant Prairie, WI Sep 1998 to May 2001 Inside Sales-Project Coordinator
Education:
University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, WI Dec 1996 Bachelor of Science in Hospitality and Tourism
Cynthia S. Bell - Chandler AZ Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ Amy E. Hansen - San Jose CA Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ
Assignee:
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara CA
International Classification:
H04N 5235
US Classification:
348362, 348364
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
Determining A Final Exposure Setting Automatically For A Sold State Camera Without A Separate Light Metering Circuit
Cynthia S. Bell - Chandler AZ, US Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ, US Amy E. Hansen - San Jose CA, US Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ, US
Assignee:
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara CA
International Classification:
H04N 5/228 H04N 5/235 H04N 5/217
US Classification:
3482291, 3482221, 3482301, 348241
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
Determining A Final Exposure Setting Automatically For A Solid State Camera Without A Separate Light Metering Circuit
Cynthia S. Bell - Chandler AZ, US Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ, US Amy E. Hansen - San Jose CA, US Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ, US
Assignee:
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara CA
International Classification:
H04N 5/235 H04N 5/238 G03B 7/00
US Classification:
348364, 3482291, 348362, 396213, 396236
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
Determining A Final Exposure Setting Automatically For A Solid State Camera Without A Separate Light Metering Circuit
Cynthia S. Bell - Chandler AZ, US Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ, US Amy E. Hansen - San Jose CA, US Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ, US
Assignee:
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara CA
International Classification:
H04N 5/228 H04N 5/235 G03B 7/00
US Classification:
348362, 3482221, 3482291
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
Determining A Final Exposure Setting Automatically For A Solid State Camera Without A Separate Light Metering Circuit
Cynthia S. Bell - Chandler AZ, US Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ, US Amy E. Hansen - San Jose CA, US Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ, US
Assignee:
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara CA
International Classification:
H04N 5/228
US Classification:
3482221, 348E05024
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
Determining A Final Exposure Setting Automatically For A Solid State Camera Without A Separate Light Metering Circuit
Edward P. Tomaszewski - Phoenix AZ, US Kannan Raj - Chandler AZ, US Amy E. Hansen - San Francisco CA, US Cynthia Bell - Chandler AZ, US
International Classification:
H04N 5/235
US Classification:
3482221
Abstract:
An embodiment of the invention is a method of generating a final exposure setting, including, (a) selecting one of a number of predetermined exposure settings as a current exposure setting for a solid state camera having a camera imager, (b) generating a captured scene by the camera imager using the current exposure setting, (c) selecting according to an automated search methodology another one of the exposure settings to be the current setting in response to the captured scene being underexposed or overexposed, and, (d) repeating (b) and (c) until the captured scene is neither underexposed or overexposed.
For the study, Lewkowicz and doctoral student Amy Hansen-Tift tested nearly 180 babies at ages 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months by showing videos of a woman speaking in English or Spanish to the babies. All the babies were born to English-speaking parents. A gadget mounted on a soft headband tracked where
So he and doctoral student Amy Hansen-Tift tested nearly 180 babies, groups of them at ages 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months.They showed videos of a woman speaking in English or Spanish to babies of English speakers. A gadget mounted on a soft headband tracked where each baby was focusing his or her gaze a