Jun 2011 to 2000 Quality ManagerJ & S Construction Hudsonville, MI Feb 2006 to Jun 2011 Project ManagerRiley Construction Associates Rockford, MI Oct 2003 to Feb 2006 SupervisorThe Grand Rapids Press
Jun 2000 to Aug 2003 Sales and Customer Service Representative
Education:
Kent Career Technical Center Grand Rapids, MI 1998 to 2000 Construction Management ProgramForest Hills Northern High School Grand Rapids, MI 1996 to 2000 Diploma
Skills:
On the job ISO 9000 and Lean Manufacturing Training Proficient knowledge of Microsoft Office Applications Auto-CAD/CAM Applications Adobe Suite Extensive experience managing projects and leading cross functional teams Data analysis with acclimation to develop programs and strategies as needed
Mollen Immunization Clinics, LLC Scottsdale, AZ 2008 to 2010 Customer Care Professional - Mollen Immunization Clinics, LLCBankers Life Glendale, AZ 2007 to 2008Tim's Buick Prescott, AZ 2003 to 2006 Accountant/Title ProcessorSo NH Medical Center Nashua, NH 2000 to 2003 Accounting ClerkGlendale Adventist Med Ctr Glendale, CA 1998 to 1999 Capitation Analyst - FinanceBusiness Office Glendale, CA 1996 to 1998 Accountant TechNMB (USA) Chatsworth, CA 1994 to 1995 Associate AccountantMSI Laboratories Burbank, CA 1992 to 1994 Medi-Cal SupervisorProgressive Orthopedic Mfg Sacramento, CA 1987 to 1992 A/R Supervisor
David Bird (born 1946 in London) is the world's most prolific bridge writer, with over one hundred books to his name. He is bridge correspondent for the Mail on ...
Us Patents
Process For Sorting Large Lists On A 64-Bit Computing Platform
Russell Guenthner - Glendale AZ, US Clinton Eckard - McMinnville TN, US David Bird - Phoenix AZ, US John Heath - Glendale AZ, US
International Classification:
G06F 7/00
US Classification:
707007000
Abstract:
A process for sorting large files or structures is disclosed where improved performance is achieved by reducing the work involved and the time required to do record key comparisons. The reduction is achieved by transposing and saving the key data from each record into a representative form that can be more quickly compared each time the key comparison is required. In addition the process uses pointers to avoid the processing time to exchange records larger than one word in memory. The representation of the key data is optimized and aligned for comparison by word based computer instructions which are typically faster than byte based instructions. The process is optimized for word sizes and instructions which handle words larger than four bytes and in particular for machines and instructions with 64-bit or larger word sizes such as the Intel Itanium series processors.
Darrell L. Fett - Scottsdale AZ David A. Bird - Phoenix AZ Jerry L. Rauser - Crystal MN
Assignee:
Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. - Phoenix AZ
International Classification:
H03K 114 H03K 1908
US Classification:
307264
Abstract:
A logic level translator utilizes a TTL logic gate, a current switch, and a clamp circuit to convert CML level binary signals into TTL level binary signals. The translator provides isolation between the TTL ground and the CML ground in order to reduce noise in the CML portion of the circuit. The clamp circuit prevents a switching transistor in the current switch from reaching saturation, thereby increasing the speed of operation of the translator. A portion of the current switch provides a quick pulldown of a switching transistor in the TTL circuit to reduce noise in the TTL circuit.
Darrell L. Fett - Scottsdale AZ David A. Bird - Phoenix AZ
Assignee:
Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. - Waltham MA
International Classification:
H03K 1908 H03K 502 H03K 508 H03K 5156
US Classification:
307208
Abstract:
A logic level translator uses a current switch, a current source and a plurality of cathode followers to convert T. sup. 2 L and DTL level binary signals into CML and ECL level binary signals. The translator provides isolation between the T. sup. 2 L ground and the CML ground so that noise in the CML signals is reduced.
An open loop proximity detector is contemplated which receives a Doppler frequency when a target is first detected, and predicts a specific fuzing Doppler frequency. The detector continues to transmit and receive electromagnetic waves and sends a detonating signal to the fuze when the predicted fuzing Doppler frequency is received by the detector. The Doppler frequency of the first, or front surface in a forward moving direction of the target is received and is used to detonate the fuze. Thus the ideal surface of the target, the front surface, detonates the fuze and Doppler frequencies from other surfaces of the target are not allowed to interfere with the detonating process.