Flight Test Engineer at Department of Defense, Board of Directors (VP) at Indian Wells Valley Airport District
Location:
Ridgecrest, California
Industry:
Aviation & Aerospace
Work:
Department of Defense since Mar 2007
Flight Test Engineer
Indian Wells Valley Airport District - KIYK since Nov 2006
Board of Directors (VP)
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Aug 1992 - Mar 2007
Facility Manager
Kay and Associates, Inc. 1992 - 1997
Production Lead
Education:
Naval Postgraduate School 2013 - 2015
MSA, Mathematics and Statistics
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 2001 - 2004
B.S., Aeronautics; Aerospace/Aviation Safety & Crash Investigation.
Cerro Coso College 1993 - 1997
A.S, Business/Computer Science
James M. Paris - Portland OR, US William M. Hogan - Lake Oswego OR, US John G. Ferguson - Tualatin OR, US
Assignee:
Mentor Graphics Corporation - Wilsonville OR
International Classification:
G06F 17/50
US Classification:
716 51, 716 56, 716136, 716137
Abstract:
A collaborative environment for performing physical verification processes on integrated circuit designs. Multiple physical verification results may be stored in a “unified” results database/directory (e. g. , unified at least from a user's perspective), where results from various verification processes, such as Design-Rule-Check (DRC) processes, Layout-Versus-Schematic comparison (LVS) processes, Design-For-Manufacturing (DFM) processes Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) processes, and Optical Rule Check (ORC) processes are accessible from the same style of user interface, which may be a graphical user interface. The basic abilities for design team-based interactions can be equally available to each process involved in the physical verification of an integrated circuit design.
James M. Paris - Portland OR, US Brian Marshall - Wilsonville OR, US John G. Ferguson - Tualatin OR, US Anant S. Adke - Lake Oswego OR, US
International Classification:
G06F 17/50
US Classification:
716112
Abstract:
Techniques for incrementally analyzing layout design data are disclose. With various implementations, a subsequent incremental analysis can be made for only portions of layout design data, using a subset of available analysis criteria, or some combination of both. For example, the analysis can be limited to errors identified in a previous analysis process, to changes in the layout design data made after a previous analysis process, to particular areas specified by a designer, or some combination thereof. Still further, the analysis process may be performed using only a subset of analysis criteria relevant to the portions of the design data being analyzed, a subset of the initial analysis criteria that the design data failed in a previous analysis process, a subset of the initial analysis criteria selected by the designer, or some combination thereof. Further, such an incremental analysis process can be initiated before a previous analysis process has completed.
President at Christian Money ocm I was born in a suburb of Chicago on January 23, 1965. I am the author of more than twenty books including; Money Management for Those Who Don't Have Any... I was born in a suburb of Chicago on January 23, 1965. I am the author of more than twenty books including; Money Management for Those Who Don't Have Any, Living Financially Free, The 10 Day Financial Breakthrough, The Christian Financial Crisis, and Absolutely Amazing Ways To Save Money on...