Benchmark Research Technologies
Chief Executive Officer
Benchmark Integrated Technologies 2003 - 2011
President
Benchmark Strategic Services 1994 - 2008
President
Education:
Harvard Medical School 1974 - 1976
Clark University 1971 - 1974
Masters, Master of Arts, Psychology
Boston University 1967 - 1971
Bachelors, Bachelor of Arts, Psychology
Skills:
Strategic Planning Contract Negotiation Program Management Leadership Real Estate Development Research Design Research Budgets Management Due Diligence Public Speaking Sustainability Project Management Entrepreneurship Research Strategy Data Data Analysis Real Estate Economics Communications Research Tableau Statistics Fundraising Nonprofits Psychology Financial Analysis Strategic Communications Analytics Strategy Market Research Econometrics Policy Analysis Data Psychologist
A system for use in evaluating the performance of an individual, the system being adapted for: (A) analyzing a first set of data to determine: (1) at least one target area for improvement, and (2) a first target area performance measurement that corresponds to a particular measurement of performance within the target area at a first particular time; (B) receiving a recommendation of a course of action intended to produce a measurable improvement in the particular measurement of performance; (C) after the implementation of the course of action, receiving a second target area performance measurement that corresponds to the particular measurement of performance within the target area at a second particular time, the second particular time being after the occurrence of the implementation of the course of action; (D) using the first and second target area performance measurements to determine a change in the particular measurement of performance; and (E) conveying the change to a user.
Survey-Based Management Performance Evaluation Systems
A system for use in evaluating the performance of an individual, the system being adapted for: (A) analyzing a first set of data to determine: (1) at least one target area for improvement, and (2) a first target area performance measurement that corresponds to a particular measurement of performance within the target area at a first particular time; (B) receiving a recommendation of a course of action intended to produce a measurable improvement in the particular measurement of performance; (C) after the implementation of the course of action, receiving a second target area performance measurement that corresponds to the particular measurement of performance within the target area at a second particular time, the second particular time being after the occurrence of the implementation of the course of action; (D) using the first and second target area performance measurements to determine a change in the particular measurement of performance; and (E) conveying the change to a user.